<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5 - Don&#8217;t talk trash about my Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/html5-dont-talk-trash-about-my-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/html5-dont-talk-trash-about-my-flash/</link>
	<description>Stephen Burgess - Interactive Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Immo</title>
		<link>http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/html5-dont-talk-trash-about-my-flash/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Immo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/?p=1029#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>I've started looking at Processing, good fun http://processingjs.org But looks like IE will be holding up things for a while. I'm not too bothered either which technology but JS/HTML5 still feels like a step back from AS3 to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve started looking at Processing, good fun <a href="http://processingjs.org" rel="nofollow">http://processingjs.org</a> But looks like IE will be holding up things for a while. I&#8217;m not too bothered either which technology but JS/HTML5 still feels like a step back from AS3 to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/html5-dont-talk-trash-about-my-flash/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/?p=1029#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Thanks mate. I am technology-neutral (err, also ignore the title of the presentation!), I've really enjoyed playing around with HTML5 and hope I'll get a chance to do a lot more in the future, I suppose I could go for something bit more generic for a url... but I'm kind of attached to flashmonkey.co.uk! :) I think once they have sorted the issues listed in the presentation HTML5 video will be great, just might be a while before we get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks mate. I am technology-neutral (err, also ignore the title of the presentation!), I&#8217;ve really enjoyed playing around with HTML5 and hope I&#8217;ll get a chance to do a lot more in the future, I suppose I could go for something bit more generic for a url&#8230; but I&#8217;m kind of attached to flashmonkey.co.uk! <img src='http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I think once they have sorted the issues listed in the presentation HTML5 video will be great, just might be a while before we get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sainsbury</title>
		<link>http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/html5-dont-talk-trash-about-my-flash/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sainsbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashmonkey.co.uk/?p=1029#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>Good presentation deck mate - it reads well even without you presenting it. Interesting to hear about the different codecs and stuff that are holding up the progress of HTML5 for video. If that deck is to be believed, we're a way off having a universal standard. The two codecs on offer are hindered by massive file sizes or massive cost - surely this will be overcome soon? Also I'm afraid I'm not convinced that you're technology-neutral. What's the title of this blog again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good presentation deck mate - it reads well even without you presenting it. Interesting to hear about the different codecs and stuff that are holding up the progress of HTML5 for video. If that deck is to be believed, we&#8217;re a way off having a universal standard. The two codecs on offer are hindered by massive file sizes or massive cost - surely this will be overcome soon? Also I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;m not convinced that you&#8217;re technology-neutral. What&#8217;s the title of this blog again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

